tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1589260955254004648.post7522609850854430727..comments2024-03-27T08:11:00.247-04:00Comments on BeeLine: What Is The Truth About Ivermectin? BeeLinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04065018970505964953noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1589260955254004648.post-41984486683737680622021-09-08T19:19:15.170-04:002021-09-08T19:19:15.170-04:00Whoops ... need to make a correction and see no wa...Whoops ... need to make a correction and see no way to edit. The numbers should be "$10B in / $200B out"jthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16802337067276998758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1589260955254004648.post-8858720872863918222021-09-08T19:16:59.453-04:002021-09-08T19:16:59.453-04:00Very good, Scott. You're following the money,...Very good, Scott. You're following the money, and that investigation always leads to more evidence that the MSM won't put out. Keep following it. Cui bono? And don't stop with the likes of the psychopathic de-population pushing pseudo- "philanthropist" Gates, who claimed in an interview with CNBC, commented on in the WSJ in July, 2020, in which he boasted that vaccines were his best investment yet, with a 20:1 return -- $20B in/ $200B out!! Look elsewhere, too, like the chief of NIAID, Dr Fraudci. What patents does he and his NIAID (whose $$$ he controls) own/control/receive royalties on connected with the "vaccines?" ... with anything "SARS-COV?" How did he manage to get control of so many of those patents? Ever hear of Dr. Judy Mikovits? Oh, and BTW, you knew, yes, that he was fully aware of the study done at the NIH (NIAID is under NIH) and published in their journal in 2005 concerning chloroquine showing that it was a potent inhibitor of coronavirus? Yes, "vaccines" (and as I've already stated, these are NOT vaccines, as vaccines were always defined as first, enabling the recipient to develop immunity and two, preventing the recipient from transmitting the pathogenic microbe -- these toxic shots do NEITHER) are massively profitable for BigPharma and those invested in it, but they are also protected. Ie, any vaccine that becomes mandated gives the manufacturer levels of immunity from death and destruction it might cause. When did that start? How much immunity? But that's not all. What are the requirements for giving a new drug an EUA? ... what has to exist, or more accurately, what has to NOT exist? And how about immunity for BigPharma for drugs /shots /treatments that have gotten an EUA? But it's so much more than money. And BTW again, from whom does the FDA receive the majority of its "funding" today? The CDC, FDA, WHO are ALL controlled by BIG MONEY ... Big Pharma, but also those that own BigPharma shares. They do NOT represent WeThePeople, nor is our well-being their top priority, if it's a priority at all for them ... and from everything i know about them, it's not...at all.jthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16802337067276998758noreply@blogger.com