Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Reality vs. Ideology

 This is an interesting graphic showing how the world has changed economically over the last 30 years.

Credit: https://x.com/gummibear737/status/2088723403452645458

Two big takeaways stand out at the top of the graphic.

Despite many who want to diminish the United States, the resilience of its economy is unmatched.

The United States actually is responsible for a larger share of global GDP today than 30 years ago.

The other big takeaway is the rise of China over this period.

China has grown from 2.4% of global GDP to 16.5%.

It is also interesting to note that the growth of global GDP to China has not been taken at the expense of the United States.

Japan and Europe have paid that price.

Japan's share of global GDP dropped from 17.7% to 3.5%.

The share of global GDP of Germany, France, UK and Italy went from 21.5% to 13.1%.

Some like to point to China's increased wealth and argue that it proves that socialism/communism can work to benefit society.

However, all of China's economic growth has been achieved after it embraced capitalist economic reforms.

The Chinese Communists were forced to put their ideology aside and accept reality.

For those who are confused about the definition of socialism.


Source: Google AI


Beginning in the 1970's China got rid of the collectivist farms in favor of each farming family getting its own plot of land.

In 1978 it was illegal to have a private business in China.

Private ownership was permitted beginning in 1979.

There are now over 50 million private businesses in China.

The country was opened to foreign investment as part of the reforms and big international companies started moving in.

Special economic zones were established where market rules applied.

One zone was opened in Shenzhen in 1980 when it was small fishing village just north of Hong Kong.

It now has over 13 million inhabitants and is a technology and logistics hub for China.

 

China was living under a socialist/communist government model from 1949 without any real improvement to its society. 

In 1980, 97% of the Chinese population still lived in extreme poverty 30 years after the communists took over.

All it took to improve life for the Chinese people was to accept reality and embrace capitalism beginning in the late 1970's

Yes. some in China got rich but the entire society was lifted up in the process beyond anything that socialism could provide.


How is it then that there are those who do not know history and somehow believe that the people of the United States would be better off with a socialist system?


Source: https://nypost.com/2026/08/16/us-news/dems-now-favor-socialism-over-capitalism-by-this-overwhelming-amount-new-poll/?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter


Consider this recent poll by CBS News/YouGov.

Democrats favor Socialism over Capitalism by 58%-32%.

Only 18% of Democrats have a negative view of Socialism but 50% have an negative view of Capitalism.

Source:  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-socialism-economy-political-parties-opinion-poll/

Compare those numbers to those of Republican voters.

Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-socialism-economy-political-parties-opinion-poll/

You have to wonder whether those who have an idealized view of Socialism compared to Capitalism have any understanding of history, how incentives drive human behavior, or the reality of what Socialism/Communism did to countries such as China, Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela?

Compare Taiwan to China.

Compare South Korea to North Korea,

Compare Venezuela before Chavez and Maduro took over and what happened after.

Of course, most already know about Cuba before and after Fidel Castro took over.

The Cuban people who migrated to the United States have prospered while those who had to live under the socialist system had to survive in an impoverished nation.



We could also go back and compare the divergent paths of West Germany and East Germany after World War II.

The West and East both had GDP per capita numbers that were nearly identical in 1949. By 1990 (at the time of reunification), the capitalist West had GDP per capita that was almost double that of the East.

The history and the reality of socialist systems have proven time and time again that they are inferior in improving society wherever you look.

Despite this, there are still millions who don't seem to be able to see it and embrace ideology over reality.

However, in the end, reality always trumps ideology.

Monday, August 17, 2026

This and That----August 17, 2026 Edition

A few random observations, charts and factoids to provide some context on what is going on in the world.

Who Would Have Thought?

Interesting data on straight vs. gay  for college students by major.

I would have thought Finance (95%) and Fine Arts (27%) would both have had more heterosexuals. 

Fashion at 71% straight must be skewed by many straight females offset by a number of gay males.

Nursing and Pre-Med overwhelmingly straight.

Most surprising number to me in this data is that only 42% of African or African American Studies majors are straight. Is this major dominated by Black women's basketball players?

However, this data overall would indicate that up to a third of all college students today are something other than straight.

This is the world we live in.

Who would have thought?





Go South Young Man (or Woman)!

Speaking of colleges, consider the change in the number of entering freshman at southern schools coming from outside the South between 2004 and 2024.



The numbers will undoubtedly be higher this Fall.

This is one of the reasons I previously predicted that more and more colleges and universities in the Northeast and Midwest would face enrollment pressures over the next decade due to declining demographics, high costs and more students from these areas heading south.


Buyer and Sellers

There are 51% more sellers looking to sell their house than buyers looking to buy right now.

Compare that to four years ago when buyers outnumbered sellers by over 30%.



Here are the raw numbers according to RedFin.

1.46 million sellers have their homes on the market.

Only 947,000 active buyers.





All real estate markets are local but this is an indication that the market that was frozen due to high prices and higher interest rates is starting to crack.

The frozen market that masked the affordability issue due to low inventories is destabilizing.

The rapid appreciation in house prices the last few years and the increase in interest rates has driven more and more potential home buyers out of the market.

At the same time, more and more sellers are deciding that they have no choice but to sell due to age, relocations, job loss, divorce, retirement etc. 

This is resulting in more sellers and less buyers in the housing market.

Expect home prices to decline in more and more markets as the forces of supply and demand drive price adjustments unless we see lower mortgage rates in the near future.


Chick-fil-A Looks Like It Would Win The Electoral College Vote

Those that know me know that I love Chick-fil-A.

I had my first experience with Chick-fil-A in 1972 at the 6th unit it had opened.

Chick-fil-A now covers the country and is far and away the top-rated fast food chain in the United States.


Alaska and Vermont are the only two states in which CFA does not have a location.

CFA is the top-rated fast food choice in 34 different states according to this recent consumer survey.


Credit: https://x.com/BrilliantMaps/status/2088695001626608097/photo/1


The only surprise to me is how Daylight Donuts could be considered the top-rated fast food chain in Georgia where Chick-fil-A was founded.

CFA has 276 units in Georgia---the most it has in any one state.

I have never heard of Daylight Donut even though it has a location within 5 miles of my house.

Daylight Donuts has over 400 locations principally centered around its original location in and around Tulsa, Oklahoma,

Source: https://brilliantmaps.com/us-locations/daylight-donuts-locations-us/

Am I missing something with Daylight Donuts?



Food Stamps Are Snapping Down


When the Big Beautiful Bill passed last year and reinstated some work requirements in order to claim SNAP benefits we were told that this would lead to starving families and children.

The new requirements have been in effect for almost a year and it has definitely resulted in fewer people claiming food stamps.

This chart shows the effects by state.

Is it a coincidence that the largest percentage decrease is in Arizona with over a 50% drop in those claiming benefits?

Nationally, the number receiving SNAP benefits has declined 12.6%---from 42.2 million to 37.0 million.




Despite this, we are still running a $2 trillion deficit.

I still have yet to hear of masses of starving families or children.

The most obvious effect I have seen is that snack food and soda sales are down.

I have not seen any reports on donut sales.

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Who Will Bailout Chicago?

New York City and Los Angeles seem to get an outsized amount of attention when it comes to their fiscal challenges.

New York City is in the news right now as Mayor Mamdani implements a new "pied-a-terre" tax on expensive homes, condos and co-ops used as second homes in the city.

Source: https://abc7ny.com/post/nyc-property-owners-express-anger-confusion-rollout-mamdanis-pied-terre-tax/19603490/

In June, Los Angeles County voters approved a tax increase effective October 1 that will raise the local sales tax to 10.25%. 


Source: https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/la-county-measure-er-pass-sales-tax/3902591/


No matter how much tax revenue these cities take in it is never enough.

Chicago seems to dominate the headlines more with its crime statistics but the Windy City is undoubtedly in far worse financial shape than New York City or Los Angeles.

It is difficult for me to see how Chicago will not have to file for bankruptcy in the next few years.

Someone is going to need to bail the city out of its fiscal mess.

The City of Chicago just finished the first half of the year with a $130 million shortfall after several revenue plans failed to produce the projected money for the city.


Source: https://news.wttw.com/2026/07/07/chicago-130m-short-after-revenue-backed-city-council-fails-materialize-johnson-says

The city's most recent budget forecast for 2027 projects a likely deficit of $1.16 billion!

Underlying Chicago's fiscal problems are massive underfunded pension plans for city employees.

The combined funding ratio for the pension plans for city employees is 28.1%.

By comparison, the national average for large city pension plans is a funded ratio is 82.5%.

Chicago only has $14 billion in pension assets compared to $51 billion in liabilities.

For context, when Detroit filed for bankruptcy in 2013 its various city pension funds were 60% to 80% funded.

This graphic illustrates just how bad Chicago's fiscal situation is with the level of pension liability underfunding it has compared to the city's total operating budget.


Credit: https://x.com/StuLoren/status/2080492418579718589

Chicago has been kicking the can down the road for so many years that they have almost destroyed the can in the process.

To make matters worse, the property tax base in the city appears to be disintegrating.

Take a look at the recent sales of commercial sales in Chicago compared to their previous sales price.

Many sale prices are down 60%, 70%, 80% or even 90% from where they were before.




Lower real estate prices mean lower real estate tax valuations which will ultimately lead to reduced property tax collections.

This will mean less revenue for city operations as well as less money for the Chicago Public Schools (CPS).

The CPS has their own fiscal problems.

In a split vote, CPS school board recently approved a $10 billion budget for the 2026/27 school year that includes $150 million of state funding that has not been approved.

By including the phantom revenue the school board averted the necessity of laying off 760 teachers, 800 or so support staff and 41 assistant principals.

All of the elected school board members voted against the budget because it included the phantom state money and avoided the difficult issue of staff layoffs.

However, those school board members appointed by Mayor Brandon Johnson (the former President of the teacher's union) all voted in favor of the budget.




You have to ask whether the CPS school board is there to just represent the teachers and staff rather than the taxpayers and students?

Since 2019, while student enrollment has decreased by 12.5%, school staff has increased by 26.4% and spending in the budget is up 71.4%.



There are dozens of school buildings in Chicago that are underutilized and overstaffed.

For example, Douglass High School has 28 students, 27 staff positions and 97% of the school facility is unutilized.

In addition, 0% of the students were proficient in reading in 2024 despite the 1:1 ratio of students to staff.


Credit: https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/2028272384470392978



The 2026/27 CPS budget works out to over $32,000 in spending per student.

To put that in context, an in-state liberal arts undergraduate student at the University of Illinois-Chicago entering this Fall will pay less than half of that cost in tuition and fees for the academic year.

Tuition per semester is $5,826 x 2= 11,652 

Fees of about $2,000 per semester would increase the total cost to $15,652 for the year---less than half of what CPS is spending to educate students in Chicago's government schools.



Source: https://uofi.app.box.com/s/3ub3lw8qeda73k7u9bl2927o66vhyvzq


Everybody complains about the high cost of college today.

However, who is pointing out that in Chicago and elsewhere there are public school systems with higher costs than public universities in the same area?

Some say that Mayor Johnson in Chicago and the CPS school board are purposely making the fiscal problems worse to hopefully facilitate a bailout from the state or the federal government at some point.

They are not interested in making the tough decisions today that are necessary to fix the fiscal problems.

Considering the increases in political spending by the Chicago Teachers Union it is not hard to believe that.




When it comes to fiscal issues as I have outlined above, you can run but you cannot hide.

Math alway wins.

A day of reckoning awaits the city of Chicago and its public school system.

They have both spent and made pension promises well beyond their abilities to pay.

The only question is who is going to end up paying the bill in the end?

Chicago taxpayers?

The sales tax in Chicago is already 10.25%.

Property taxes on residential property as a % of value are higher than in New York City, LA and Philadelphia.  The tax on commercial property is one of the highest rates in the country.

State law prohibits the adoption of a city income tax but that could be in Chicago's future if the Illinois state legislature passed a law to allow it.

If Chicago taxpayers don't pay their own bills, who will?

Illinois taxpayers?

Bond holders?

United States taxpayers?

Pensioners?

Someone always pays and somehow it is never the politicians who created the mess.
 

Monday, August 10, 2026

Cultural Changes Wherever You Look

It seems that everywhere you look we are seeing cultural changes in the United States.

Billboard has been publishing a Hot 100 list of the most popular songs since 1958.

For the first time in history, the top 5 on the list are all Country songs

Source: https://variety.com/2026/music/news/country-songs-billboard-hot-100-ella-langley-stella-lefty-1236826778/

Here are the top 5 songs.


Source: https://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100/

Country music in the last several years has been gaining in popularity while Rap has been in decline.

From 2020-2023 Rap music songs made up 34% ot the Billboard Top 10 and Country only 7%.

The last two years Country has made up 27% on that list and Rap only 17%.


Right now there is not one rap song in the Top 10,

In fact, there has not been a Hip-Hop/Rap song in the Top 10 in over a year.

Yes, we are seeing a major cultural shift in music.

Those cultural changes also extend to the use of alcohol, cigarettes and marijuana.

More Americans now use marijuana daily than drink or smoke.




Many argue that people should have the freedom to do what they want to do.

However, at what point do societal costs get factored in?

Consider a few of the negative effects of marijuana usage.


Higher risk of developing depression and anxiety?

Is the increase in anxiety disorders in younger Americans just a coincidence?

Credit: https://jonathanhaidt.com/anxious-generation/


Impaired ability to process complex information?

These people are also voting.

I wonder what percentage of Democrat Socialists are daily users of marijuana?

Every complex issue can be solved simply according to their platform.

For example, the DSA's solution to the high cost of living?

You should not have to pay any bills or have any debt.

The government should pay for everything you need.

It's simple.

The DSA says you won't have bills anymore if you vote for their candidates.





The cultural changes also extend to population changes in the nation.

Consider this recent Census Bureau population data on Georgia.

Whites in Georgia are no longer a majority of the population in that state.

People of color are now the majority of Georgia's population.

This is Georgia that used to be considered the heart of the Confederacy.

Non-Hispanic Whites now make up only 48% of the population of the state of Georgia.

International immigrants alone added 500,000 to Georgia's population in the last five years.




Source: Grok


Is it a surprise that Georgia is no longer considered a red state from a voting perspective?

In 2024, Trump received 71% of White voters in Georgia

Kamala Harris received 77% of non-White voters.

That is a very large cultural divide.

It is as if the two groups are living in two different universes.

Republicans in Georgia are swimming upstream against that demographic current.

The cultural divide is even more pronounced in Dearborn, Michigan.

Dearborn is now over 50% Muslim.

Residents now wake up to the Muslim call to prayer.

Link: https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2086109427577532581


At the same time, Muslims in Dearborn now want to ban the ringing of church bells in the city.


Link: https://x.com/1109Patricia/status/2057418160756711828


Yes, cultural changes wherever you look.

The United States has a long history of being a melting pot and a refuge for people seeking a better life.

We often hear that diversity is a strength and immigration is one of the things that has made the United States greater than any nation in the world.

This is undoubtedly true. However, this assumes common values, beliefs, goals and objectives. 

It also assumes that those who immigrate to the United States want to assimilate and fully commit their future and faith to their new country---not the country or culture that they left.

If these foundational principles are not shared uniformly, diversity is a weakness, not a strength. In point of fact, diversity is a fatal flaw if the foundational principles and cultural framework are not aligned. 

It can lead to a cataclysmic clash of cultures.

The big question is whether the United States will be able to bridge all of these cultural changes and divides and continue to be UNITED?

That remains to be seen.

Friday, August 7, 2026

Beware The Preference Cascade, Dr. Fauci

Do you know what a preference cascade is?

One person who should beware of it is Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Source: Google AI

I recently wrote about Fauci and what we are finding he was saying and doing in private compared to what he was saying in public during Covid.

All through the Covid pandemic Fauci was lionized by the media and the establishment.

He was considered all knowing and told us that he was always guided by "the science".

The contents of his diary and his unwillingness to testify under oath to a Senate committee by invoking the Fifth Amendment, despite having a preemptive Presidential pardon in hand, has shown a different side of Fauci to the public.

In my recent blog post, I suggested that it was not far fetched to believe that we would soon see some (if not most) Democrats and media types throw Fauci under the bus to protect their own reputations in light of the contents of his diary and the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard last month.

The X account below references a number of examples where the preference cascade is already beginning to sweep Fauci under the rug.

This post summarizes a longer article that you can read here.

The important point here is that there has been no real change in the underlying facts.

The only thing that has changed is the social cost calculation in believing Fauci's argument that Covid was of natural origin from bats rather than a lab leak in Wuhan and other narratives that Fauci pushed during the pandemic (the utility of face masks, arguing against the value of natural immunity, the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, etc).

Those that countered Fauci on these points were branded as dangerous purveyors of misinformation and conspiracy theorists.

Once it is seen that high status voices are stepping away from the former narrative more people feel comfortable in speaking up and stating what has been obvious to a minority for a long time.

However, many did not speak up before simply because the social costs of doing so are so severe.

Think about the fairy tale "The Emperor Has No Clothes".

The only one willing to speak the truth that the Emperor had no clothes on was a young boy who had no social connections and did not know any better.



The change in attitudes might start with a trickle of those willing to speak the truth but it very quickly becomes a torrential cascade.

We may already be seeing the beginnings of a preference cascade with Dr. Fauci.

The most significant development I have seen in all of this so far has been the admission from Dr. Ashish Jha, the White House Covid-19 Response Coordinator during the pandemic, that he now believes it most likely came about from a lab leak.

CNN's Dana Bash appears crestfallen hearing that news.


Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/02/politics/video/former-white-house-covid-19-response-coordinator-dr-ashish-jha-dana-bash-it-was-probably-a-lab-leak


Keep all of this in mind as you see what develops with Fauci in the next few months when he does not have the total protection of his media sycophants.

Fauci was "The Good Doctor" when he was at the height of his media adulation in July, 2020.

We will have to see where he lands if the Preference Cascade takes control.

It can sometimes be a short trip from famous to infamous.

If you would like to learn more about Preference Cascades and the related Preference Falsification you might be interested in reading the blog post below that I wrote on the subject in late 2024.

Our experiences with the Covid pandemic and the election of Donald Trump are great examples of both of these concepts.


The Power of a Preference Cascade

(originally published December 18, 2024)

Human beings are social animals.

Societies from the beginning of time have been built upon families, tribes, groups and human relationships.

For most of history these relationships were a critical element in survival. Those that did not congregate and collaborate were at much greater personal risk.

Those who were outliers and did not conform to the customs, conventions and mores of the group were at risk of being shunned and banned.

There remains a strong desire to conform today even if if it is not as crucial to survival as it once was.

For example, take a look at this image of students being led from their school in Madison, Wisconsin after the horrific shooting in that city on Monday that I noticed in coverage of the killings.

I guess you are only cool if you wear pajama bottoms to school.

Source: https://beelineblogger.blogspot.com/2024/12/where-does-trump-stand-on-time.html

The desire to conform is strong in all of us.

This is true even if you privately believe the group is off base or wrong in what they are saying or doing.

It is far easier to conform and not stick your head out from the crowd. Being part of the crowd carries less risk. It is safer to be a part of the crowd so you can avoid being called out or noticed.

You may even "go along to get along" to keep the peace and not make waves.

That describes me during Covid.

I had done all the research and wrote extensively in these pages about the total lack of any evidence that wearing a surgical or cloth mask provided any protective benefits against the Covid virus.

However, despite that knowledge and belief, I dutifully put on a skimpy mask when I went into a grocery or other store during Covid. It just was not worth the dirty looks and scorn I would get if I did not conform to the narrative.

That is an example of what is called Preference Falsification.

My public action was contrary to what my private beliefs were on the benefit of wearing a mask.

Here is an article on Preference Falsification in Psychology Today.


In its worst manifestation, people will even take actions against their own self interest in a false belief in order to gain favor with what they believe to be the majority view.

For example, consider the woke turn that Disney took despite the fact that its core business market was family entertainment.

Source: https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/02/19/disney-a-billion-dollar-casualty-of-woke/

The woes facing Disney illustrate the powerful hold wokeness now has on big corporations. It’s as if Disney’s leaders felt compelled to toe the line on the identitarian agenda. They were prepared to trash the company’s reputation and alienate its fans, seemingly just to signal their allegiance to this new elite ideology.


Or Bud Light deciding it would help their brand identity and sell more beer by featuring a transgender personality in their advertising.


How do we get to a place that big brands like Disney and Bud Light would blow up billions of dollars of company value on actions that were in direct contradiction to the traditional views of its consumer base?

It was preference falsification. Disney and Bud Light were more concerned with attempting to curry favor by aligning with the woke narrative and the elites who promoted it.

The Leftists in America have spent decades bullying people into believing "woke" ideas on race, gender and politics. Constant media repetition amplified those ideas until anyone who might question the narrative thought they were the outlier.  If anyone did voice objection, they were mobbed or canceled which meant that over time fewer and fewer were willing to speak up. 

After awhile most everyone believes the narrative is the majority view, even if it is false.

This is why totalitarian governments spend so much time and effort on propaganda and using the police to crush even minor dissent. They want to create the illusion that all is well and make sure that anyone who might dissent does not understand the full extent that fellow citizens similarly dislike the regime. This is why preference falsification is such a powerful force.

However, even more powerful is a preference cascade.

A preference cascade occurs when the false spell is broken and masses of the discontented who believed they were alone come to realize that their beliefs are widely shared.

This is when revolutions occur or when a massive change in public attitudes becomes apparent.

Preference falsification may build slowly and stealthily.

However, a preference cascade occurs quickly when the falsification unwinds suddenly and causes a rapid transformation of society around the new found shared majority beliefs surprising outside observers and citizens alike.

The seminal academic work on preference falsifications and preference cascades is contained in a book written by economist Timur Kuran that was originally published in 1995.


Source: https://www.amazon.com/Private-Truths-Public-Lies-Falsification/dp/0674707583



I have come across a large number of people since the election remark how they feel as if something fundamental has changed in the last month.

The best explanation for that is the power of a preference cascade.

Donald Trump winning the recent election with a popular majority was an important turning point.

It showed to a number of people that they were not crazy. They were not alone. They were not misinformed. They do not have to remain silent for fear of being marginalized or maligned.

By the same token, it has caused those who relentlessly pushed the woke agenda, DEI, open borders, antisemitism and the like that they hold minority views. It has been a humbling experience and to this point it appears that they do not quite know how to react.

The realization that the Trump voters are in the majority and the Democrats on their heels is a powerful combination and we seem to be in the midst of preference cascade that may lead us into further transformation in society.

Of course, there is little doubt that Donald Trump is most responsible for this massive change in psychology.

He was the one man who was not afraid to stand up and speak his mind going all the way back to 2015.

Make no mistake that a big reason that the Democrats, Big Government and Big Media attacked Trump so viciously over the last decade is that he was such a threat to the preference falsification narrative they were using to maintain power.

The same is true for Elon Musk after he bought Twitter. When Musk committed Twitter (now X) to being the free speech outlet when every other major social media and Big Media platform was promoting the preference falsification narrative, it opened up more eyes and became harder to keep the false illusion alive.

We are in a different place today primarily due to Trump and Musk.

We don't yet know where all of this will lead.

However, do not underestimate the power of a preference cascade.

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

A Clash of Religions and Civilizations

A key tenet of most every religion in the world is to tame and control the worst instincts in all of us.

This is clearly at the heart of the Christian and Jewish faiths that formed the foundations of Western Civilization.

For example, the Bible says human hearts are naturally flawed and easily tempted to do wrong.

Christianity contrasts selfish human desires with the positive traits that God's spirit produces.

Jesus showed us that evil thoughts, anger, and greed start inside a person before turning into actions.

Christians are taught to focus on good, true, and pure thoughts to change their inner desires.

Believers are told to love their neighbors and to actively stop and turn away from anger, greed and lust. 

Christians are told to ask the Holy Spirit for daily strength through prayer to resist the temptation of the flesh.

The same is not true with Islam.

Dan Burmawi is the Executive Director of the Ideological Defense Institute and is a theological scholar.

Burmawi was born and raised as a Muslim in Jordan but converted to Christianity and was forced to move to Lebanon.

He has written several books including Islam, Israel and the West, which examines the "theological and ideological foundations of the Arab–Israeli conflict and Western engagement with political Islam. "

I recently came across some comments that Burmawi made about the contrast of the Judeo-Christian foundational principles of Western Civilization compared to Islam.

It was something that I had not considered before but it goes a long way in explaining the clash of cultures that we see playing out every day around the world.

Burmawi warns that what we are dealing with regarding Islam is not about religious or geopolitical differences, the clash is civilizational at the deepest level.

Burmawi's thoughts on the subject.

Islam is the sanctification of man’s most corrupted instincts. 

It takes what is base in human nature and give it a divine sanction.

Man’s desire to dominate women? Islam codifies it. Veiling, polygamy, child marriage, testimony worth half a man’s, all justified as God’s will.

The tribal impulse of “my group over yours”? Islam raises it to the level of theology: believers vs. infidels, the ummah against the world.

The lust for supremacy and conquest? Islam calls it jihad and makes it a religious demand.

The primal rage at dissent? Islam turns it into law: apostasy punishable by death.

Man’s lust for unlimited sex? Islam provides it: four wives, temporary marriages, concubines, sex slaves, and the promise of virgins in paradise. 

This is why Islam went global. It spread because it indulged what was already animal in humans. 

It is like pornography, irresistible to the flesh, destructive to the soul.

It thrives because it removes all discipline from sexuality, power and ego. 

It appeals to the raw, the unrefined, the barbaric impulse in man, and calls it holy.

The West, by contrast, was built on the exact opposite impulse. The Judeo-Christian tradition does not legitimize man’s depravity, it restrains it.

Western civilization is not the freedom of instincts but the discipline of them. 

It is the recognition that man’s raw impulses lead to tyranny, slavery, and barbarism unless they are checked by higher law.

The clash between Islam and the West is not merely geopolitical. It is civilizational at the deepest level: 

Whether human nature should be indulged or disciplined, whether man’s lowest instincts are to be worshipped or restrained.

Seeing Burmawi's thoughts on Islam I could not help but also remember what Winston Churchill wrote in 1899 in his book the River War that he published after serving with the British Army in the Sudan War.

Churchill stated that "no stronger retrograde force exists in the world" than Islam.


How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.


Yes, this was written over 100 years ago by a young Churchill who clearly moderated his views later in life.

However, if you take Burmawi's views today along with Churchill's from a century ago, it does reinforce the view that we have two very different and competing philosophies on how civilization is supposed to operate.

Can we just ignore it?

Europe seems to think so.

We are seeing how that works out every day and in every way.


Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/europe/least-18-die-49000-breach-border-morocco-spanish-territory-rcna590183


Monday, August 3, 2026

Caitlin Clark, the WNBA and the Golden Egg

There are many things in this world that defy logic and rational thinking.

One is the WNBA (Women's National Basketball Association).

The women's league was formed 20 years ago by the NBA to further the game of basketball.

Despite the women's game becoming more popular in the last several years primarily due to new players such as Caitlin Clark. Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers, the WNBA continue to lose money.

The WNBA lost a reported collective amount of $50 million in 2025 after losing $40 million in 2024.

The arrival of Caitlin Clark in 2024 brought increased attendance and tv viewership but it has not helped the bottom line as players demanded more money under a new collective bargaining agreement.

For example, compare the attendance at Atlanta Dream games when playing the Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark compared to other opponents.

Atlanta averages over 17,000 per game when Caitlin Clark is in town compared to a normal average of just over 4,000 since she joined the league.


Source: Google AI


You can also see the effect that Clark has had in looking at tv viewership.

Caitlin Clark has played in every game on this list of the top WNBA audiences in the last 25 years.

She was also the centerpiece of the NBA draft show in 2024 when she was the first overall selection.

Remove Caitlin Clark from the equation and the WNBA loses fans in the seats and viewers on the screen.

Of course, that equates to less revenues to the NBA and the WNBA owners.

Source: https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2026/07/wnba-viewership-fever-liberty-among-most-watched-since-2000/

You also have this.

Every measurable that is important to revenue generation in the WNBA leads back to Caitlin Clark.

Clark's team, the Indiana Fever, generates more social media impressions than every other WNBA team COMBINED.




For years the WNBA asked basketball fans to give the league a chance. Not many paid attention despite many talented players who were on the court.

Caitlin Clark showed up and suddenly a lot of people started paying attention. That is not an opinion. It is in the facts above.

The WNBA ought to be celebrating and sanctifying her presence.

Caitlin Clark is what Tiger Woods did for the PGA Tour and Michael Jordan did for the NBA.

She is the Aesop's goose that lays golden eggs.

In a logical world the WNBA would do everything in their power to promote and protect her.

That is not the world we live in.

Clark seems to be a target in every game she plays.

She is the victim of more flagrant fouls than anyone else in the league.

She is routinely bodied and beaten up and the referees sit on their whistles.

The WNBA seems to go out of its way to argue Clark is not really that good and is not the reason that the popularity of the of their league has grown in the last three years.

Last week Clark had the fourth triple double of her career.



That is the third most in WNBA history and the most by a guard.

Clark is only in her third year in the league.

However, WNBA players recently voted Caitlin Clark as only the 11th best guard in the league.



These are considered the current leaders in the WNBA for the MVP this year.

Caitlin Clark is not mentioned.



None of these women has ever had a triple double.

Clark's 2026 statistics by comparison.

She is averaging more points and more assists per game than Bueckers and Miles who the WNBA players rank higher than Clark.

Source: https://www.statmuse.com/wnba/ask/caitlin-clark-2026-stats

More relevant, Caitlin Clark leads the WNBA in offensive production despite being hurt and missing 3 games compared to most other players.

She's accounted for 40% of her team's scoring this year between her points and assists.

But she is not considered a leading contender for MVP?

Isn't that the definition of the most valuable player?


One of the more impressive stats I have seen regarding Clark is this one.

Average distance on 3 point FG's.

Better than every NBA player's career stat and not another WNBA player on the list.


Yes, the women play with a smaller ball and the same rim size which makes it easier for the ball to go through the hoop.

However, this is still an astounding stat.

Considering all of the above and what she means to the WNBA, how is it that the league and its players seem to be determined to diminish and destroy her?

It makes no sense in a sane world.

Why does the WNBA want to destroy itself by diminishing their biggest star and fan draw?

The only answer I can come up with is jealousy, racism and resentment.

Two-thirds of WNBA players are Black.

25% of WNBA player are openly gay and estimates are that the actual number of LBGTQ+ representation in the league is closer to 40%.

Clark is white and straight.

Is there another way to explain it?

I wish I could see it.

Image created by Grok Imagine