And yet it has been debated, deferred, delayed and deliberated on by the Obama administration for more than five years.
Let's review a list of just a few of the advantages of building the pipeline.
1. It would create thousands of new jobs.
2. It would provide enhance energy security for the United States.
3. It would promote economic growth.
4. It would ensure a continuing supply of low cost energy to the United States.
5. It would enhance our national security through enhanced energy security
6. It would benefit us from a geopolitical perspective (Russia, Ukraine, the Middle East).
7. It would benefit us environmentally.
The environment? How could that be? I am sure you have heard that is why President Obama has held up the pipeline.
However, the oil that would flow through that pipeline is already being shipped into the United States from the oil rich sands of Western Canada and to other regions of the country from the Bakken formation in North Dakota. It just is being transported in rail cars rather than through a pipeline.
Consider the growth in oil being transported in the United States by rail carloads over the last few years.
What is troubling about this from an environmental perspective is that only 15% of the 92,000 DOT-111 tank cars in use meet current federal safety standards according to Business Insurance magazine.
The chances of an oil spill occurring through a train derailment also are much higher than having a similar incident with a pipeline. The Manhattan Institute analyzed years of data and found that incidents involving trains occurred about three times as often as pipeline per billion ton miles shipped per year.
The Manhattan Institute study also found that there are fewer fatalities and injuries for operators and the general public when transporting oil and other hazardous materials via pipeline as compared to rail. Therefore, it is difficult to see the environmental concerns with the pipeline.
|Lac-Magantic, Quebec Oil Train Derailment and Explosion, July, 2013|
I am continually amazed at how short-sighted and narrow minded the minds of liberals are.
This seems to be another example of what I wrote about in Seen and Unseen.
Democrats and liberals favor policy solutions based on how they think the world should work in theory. Republicans and conservatives support policies based on how the world really works in practice.
Liberals don't like oil and coal because they think they are dirty and they defile the environment. However, they also like their hair dryers, iPads and electric cars and they all need energy to make them work. Solar and wind farms can't do the job. And they are ugly as well if they are in your backyard.
Liberals also generally confine themselves solely to visible effects when they consider issues. They seem to consider only first-level effects and ignore everything else that might flow from that. They live in a simple, superficial, single dimension universe. All of their focus is on what they see right in front of them. They ignore the unseen issues.
Therefore, they oppose a pipeline for environmental reasons even though the environment will be at far greater risk when oil is being transported by rail than it would be from the pipeline they oppose. They also totally ignore all the other positive benefits to their country, the economy and their fellow citizens from that pipeline.
I could rail on but I won't. There is enough railing going on. When will President Obama realize it? At some point he needs to start