Monday, September 24, 2012

Who Is Skewing Us?

I have written about the polling in the Presidential race here and here.

As I have analyzed a number of the polls and look at the internals it seems obvious that some very big assumptions are being made on turnout that may or may not come to pass come November 6.  Most polls seem to be assuming that many more Democrats than Republicans are going to vote this year as was the case in 2008.  Of course, that was not the case in 2010 when turnout was evenly split between R's and D's and Republicans captured more seats in federal, state and local races than any time in history.

I came across the UnSkewedPolls.com website today that takes all of the polls and uses assumptions on turnout that are more consistent with current voter party identification data than looking at past history.  What would the media buzz be if these poll results were being reported every night?

The results are very telling and show a completely different picture than what is being reported on the evening news.   Romney supporters take heart!  These numbers may be as wrong as what is being published in the polls right now.  However, the assumptions and methodology that is used could be just as easily justified as any other method.  The truth probably lies somewhere in between.


PollDateSampleMoEObama(D)Romney(R)Spread
UnSkewed Avg.9/4 - 9/20----44.051.8Romney +7.8
Reason/Rupe9/13 - 9/17787 LV4.345.052.0Romney +7
Reuters/Ipsos9/12 - 9/201437 LV2.944.054.0Romney +10
NBC News/WSJ9/12 - 9/16736 LV3.644.051.0Romney +7
Monmouth Univ.9/13 - 9/161344 LV2.545.050.0Romney +5
QStarNews9/10 - 9/1520753.044.055.0Romney +11
NY Times/CBS News9/8 - 9/121162 LV3.044.051.0Romney +7
Democracy Corps9/8 - 9/121000 LV3.143.052.0Romney +8
Fox News9/9 - 9/111056 LV3.045.048.0Romney +3
Wash. Post/ABC News9/7 - 9/9826 LV4.045.052.0Romney +7
CNN/ORC9/7 - 9/9875 RV3.545.053.0Romney +8
IBD/CSM/TIPP9/4 - 9/9808 RV3.541.050.0Romney +9
ARG9/4 - 9/61200 LV3.043.053.0Romney +10


It makes you wonder who is really trying to skew us?

No comments:

Post a Comment